Excerpts from the study:

ABSTRACT

Many have argued that the outbreak of COVID-19 is the result of the release of a viral based bioweapon. Vaccines to COVID-19 have been developed and a policy of universal immunization has been initiated with total disregard to the fact that the virus may be a bioweapon. The potential risk of a catastrophe exists in part because all the vaccines contain the spike protein and or the mRNA/DNA encoding for the COVID-19 associated spike protein. These vaccines were designed and placed on the market with little knowledge of how the spike protein or its nucleic acid causes disease and without knowledge of long-term adverse effects of the vaccines. This paper reviews many of the potential long-term risks that could result from receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines. The potential for the spike protein and its mRNA to cause prion disease is reviewed as well as reasons why the vaccine could be much more dangerous than the natural infection. Adenoviral derived COVID-19 vaccines are particularly risky because of their potential to recombine with human DNA or viruses already in the human recipient. The result could be new infectious adenoviral species containing spike proteins that could infect humans and farm animals used for food. Some of the COVID-19 vaccines utilize novel technology including nanotechnology and novel adjuvants that increase intracellular penetration of cells and can potentially exacerbate chronic toxicity from the spike protein. Governments should consider suspending sale of the COVID-19 vaccines until they have a better understanding of their risks.

Conclusion

The plan to rapidly immunize the world’s population with COVID-19 vaccines that either contain or code for a poorly understood spike protein and have only a few months of safety data is extremely risky. This immunization policy has the potential to result in a catastrophic event. Such a catastrophe could occur if the vaccines induce prion disease in as few as 5% of the recipients because of the money and resources needed to care for patients with prion disease. Furthermore, a catastrophe could occur with the live viral vaccines against COVID-19 if the immunization program leads to large scale contamination of the livestock food chain with prion disease. The policy to place the COVID-19 vaccines on the market is even more irresponsible when one considers that many believe the outbreak of COVID-19 is from a viral based bioweapon and the vaccines contain a key component of the alleged bioweapon, the spike protein!

The true mortality of COVID-19 is quite debatable because of how statistics are generated. In the past a patient sent to a hospice with terminal cancer and who developed a respiratory infection prior to death would be classified as a cancer death. The same cancer patient who obtained an COVID-19 infection at the hospice would now likely be classified as a death due to COVID-19. While there is no doubt that some otherwise healthy individuals die from COVID-19, there is also no doubt that the morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 to date have been grossly exaggerated.

The most important issue with the COVID-19 outbreak that is being ignored is whether the outbreak is a bioweapon attack, and who is behind the attack. The author [16,25,31] and others have presented evidence supporting a bioweapon etiology for the outbreak of COVID-19. There is concern that that some of the perpetrators are high up in the US government. This is based on the fact that the anthrax attack against the USA in 2001 was found to have originated at the US military bioweapon base, Fort Detrick, and not from Muslim extremists as the anthrax laden letters claimed. After the origins of the attack became known the FBI investigation was shut down against the advice of the FBI agent running the investigation, Richard Lee Lambert. Lambert went on to file an Qui Tam case against the US government which described his superiors’ effort to hinder the investigation of the anthrax attack and to prematurely close the case [32].

Prior to the release of the anthrax laden envelopes in 2001, Congressman Dan Burton held a hearing in 1999 [33] questioning why there was such a big effort to immunize troops against anthrax. Certain members of Congress insisted an anthrax attack against America was imminent and would come from enemies overseas. These Congressmen were correct and an attack did come 2 years later, but it was an false flag attack originating from the US army’sbioweaponfacilityatFortDetrick.Retrospectivelyitdoes look highly suspicious that these Congressmen were so confident an attack was coming since the attack came from a US military base! The Congressional hearing in 1999 has all the appearance of aiding the false flag attack by convincing the public that terrorists from overseas were going to attack the USA. The false flag anthrax attack aided in the US decision to invade several Muslim countries including Iraq and Afghanistan as well as drastically increase funding of US government labs for further bioweapons research.

There has been a lot of effort in part from senior US government officials to blame China for an ongoing bioweapon attack with COVID-19. This effort mimics the dishonest efforts by members of the US government to accuse certain Muslim nations of having weapons of mass destruction and attacking the US with anthrax in 2001. There is actually little evidence tying China to the COVID-19 outbreak except that NIH sent a lab in Wuhan millions of dollars for research. The first clinical cases resembling COVID-19 appeared in April of 2019 in the USA [31] and the first nucleic acid sequences of the virus were detected in Spain in March of 2019 [34], The first deadly outbreak of a respiratory illness resembling COVID-19 in a senior living facility occurred in Springfield, Virginia in Fairfax County [35] in July of 2019. Not surprisingly the notorious US bioweapons facility, Fort Detrick, was also closed down in July of 2019 for an extended period of time [36]. All of this occurred long before the outbreak of COVID-19 occurred in Wuhan, China in October of 2019.

Based on witnessing what I perceived as illegal bioweapon activity while training at NIH and witnessing suspicious activity for an additional 30 years while working in the vaccine field, I believe that one needs to be very cautious about the COVID-19 vaccines. I believe that the organizations most likely to release a follow up attack to the anthrax attack would be the same organizations in the US who initiated the original anthrax attack and were never prosecuted. These same institutions/organizations are promoting the COVID-19 vaccines. Dr. Joseph Moshe, an American virologist, came forward to warn the public about bioweapons by admitting that he was part of an organized group deliberately poisoning vaccines to use as a bioweapon. There have been accusation that tetanus immunization programs in many third world nations actually injected tetanus vaccine spiked with HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin to induce infertility. The Catholic Church in Kenya called for an halt to tetanus immunization programs after the church’s own consultants found 30% of the tetanus vaccine vials contained HCG [37]. This fact lead many to believe that the immunization program was an deliberate attempt to make the recipients infertile. It is hard to explain how an human hormone, HCG, would end up in a tetanus vaccine created from bacteria in a process devoid of human cell products.

The novel COVID vaccines create potential hazards that could be worse than the COVID-19 infections. If the COVID-19 epidemic is indeed the result of an bioweapon attack originating from within the US government, as was the anthrax attack of 2001, then one or more of the COVID vaccines could also be bioweapons. Criticism in the lay press comprising false and misleading statements from non-experts regarding a scientifically sound peer reviewed paper linking the COVID-19 vaccines to risk of prion disease [16] suggests the paper’s conclusion are on the mark! The potential vaccine recipient must think carefully about the real risk of COVID-19 to him or herself before receiving a COVID-19 specific vaccine.

Review of Covid-19 Vaccines and the Risk of Chronic Adverse Events Including Neurological Degeneration first line option for the foreseeable future until head-to-head long- term comparisons are performed between the MMR vaccine and COVID-19 specific vaccines. While the data supporting MMR, vaccines use against COVID-19 is mainly emperic in nature there is a broad range of data supporting its use. The adverse events of the MMR have been studied enough to know immunization of adults is unlikely to lead to catastrophic crisis in the general population. By contrast the COVID-19 specific vaccines in the US have all been approved by the FDA approved under Emergency Use Authorization without even 6 months of safety data. The fact that all of the COVID-19 vaccines employ novel technology creates the risk for a catastrophe. The author believes the decision to approve these novel vaccines for marketing to the general population was premature.

Link to the study: